The claim for a rating greater than 40 percent for residuals of traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been dismissed.,The claim to reopen the previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss is granted. The claim to reopen the previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for muscle damage of the abdomen, claimed as stomach pain, stomach problems, is denied.
The deciding factor: The appellant withdrew her appeal with respect to the issue of entitlement to a rating greater than 40 percent for residuals of traumatic brain injury.,New and material evidence has been received to warrant the reopening of the previously denied claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss. The appellant's husband provided a statement describing her symptoms, but this evidence was not considered new and material as it did not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)","issues_on_appeal":["Rating for residuals of TBI"]}, {"condition_name":"Bilateral Hearing Loss","issues_on_appeal":["Entitlement to service connection","Rating greater than 40 percent"]}, {"condition_name":"Muscle Damage of the Abdomen (Stomach Pain)","issues_on_appeal":["Entitlement to service connection"]}, {"condition_name":"Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome","issues_on_appeal":["Service connection"]}, {"condition_name":"Cervical Spine Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)","issues_on_appeal":["Service connection"]}, {"condition_name":"Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Left Foot","issues_on_appeal":["Rating greater than 30 percent"]}, {"condition_name":"Dry-Eye Syndrome, Status Post Removal of Chalazion","issues_on_appeal":["Compensable rating"]}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 3, 2019
- Citation
- 19100498
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for myasthenia gravis based on the Veteran's exposure to hazardous substances during his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.