The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim is denied as he does not have a current disability recognized for VA purposes.,The Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for erectile dysfunction, residuals of failed ileoanal reservoir, and PTSD are all denied due to lack of causation by VA care or treatment.,The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of recurrent ventral hernia repair is denied as there was no additional disability caused by VA care or treatment.,Service connection for PTSD is remanded, indicating further development may be needed.
The deciding factor: The Veteran does not have a current hearing loss disability recognized for VA purposes. The audiometric testing did not meet the regulatory requirements for establishing such a disability.,VA's examination and review of treatment records found no evidence of additional disability caused by VA care or treatment, nor was there any unforeseen event that contributed to the disabilities.,The Veteran’s residuals of failed ileoanal reservoir were not caused by VA care or treatment. The causation element under 1151 requires a finding of fault on VA's part in providing such care or treatment.,Service connection for PTSD is remanded as there was no evidence presented to establish that the disability resulted from VA care or treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hearing loss, PTSD, residuals of failed ileoanal reservoir, residuals of recurrent ventral hernia repair, erectile dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 16, 2019
- Citation
- 19103941
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,776 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19103941.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Granted
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has granted service connection for PTSD and Mood Disorders, both presumed conditions under the PACT Act.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.