Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability is denied as the preponderance of evidence does not support a nexus between service and current hearing loss.,The Veteran's tinnitus is denied as there is no current diagnosis of tinnitus in the medical records.,The Veteran's asthma is denied as there is no evidence that it began during service or is related to an in-service injury, event, or disease.,Female reproductive system cancer (fallopian tube cancer and hysterectomy) is remanded for a determination on whether it is related to herbicide exposure.,Residuals of breast cancer are also remanded for a determination on whether they are related to herbicide exposure.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's current hearing loss disability was not shown until many years after discharge and the preponderance of evidence does not support a nexus between service and current hearing loss.,There is no current diagnosis of tinnitus in the medical records, and the Veteran has not provided credible testimony regarding her symptoms.,The Veteran's asthma is not related to an in-service injury or disease, as there is no evidence that she exhibited symptoms during service or was treated for asthma.,Female reproductive system cancer (fallopian tube cancer and hysterectomy) cannot be presumed due to lack of a diagnosis within one year of discharge. The claim must be reviewed on a direct basis with consideration of herbicide exposure.,Residuals of breast cancer are also not related to an in-service injury or disease, as there is no evidence that she exhibited symptoms during service or was treated for breast cancer.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, asthma, female reproductive system cancer (fallopian tube cancer and hysterectomy), residuals of breast cancer
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 31, 2019
Citation
19107255

Veterans Law Judge

DAVID L. WIGHT

Decisions by this judge: 2,156 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19107255.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.