Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is granted as service-connected.,The Veteran's respiratory disability, presumed to be due to asbestos exposure in service, is denied.,The Veteran's headache disability is granted as service-connected.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability (including PTSD, depression, and anxiety) is denied.

The deciding factor: The Veteran has already been service-connected for tinnitus based on in-service noise exposure. The Board found that the March 2013 VA examination was inadequate and granted the benefit of doubt to find a relationship between bilateral hearing loss and service.,There is no evidence indicating that there is a relationship between the Veteran’s asbestos exposure and a respiratory disability, as he did not have a diagnosis of asthma until after service. The Board found that his current respiratory disability is not related to any period of his active duty, including any asbestos exposure.,The Veteran's headache disability was conceded in service due to an occipital injury. Post-service treatment records continue to show complaints of headaches. The August 2017 VA examiner concluded the Veteran does not have a diagnosis of PTSD and provided a negative etiological opinion regarding his headache disability.,There is no evidence indicating that the Veteran engaged in combat or experienced fear of hostile military activity, nor was there credible supporting evidence for any claimed stressor related to service. The August 2017 VA examiner concluded the Veteran does not have PTSD.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, respiratory disability, headache disability, an acquired psychiatric disability
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 7, 2019
Citation
19109684

Veterans Law Judge

CAROLINE B. FLEMING

Decisions by this judge: 1,037 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19109684.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.