Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Veteran's CAD, status post CABG, is currently rated at 60 percent and the evidence does not support a higher rating.,The Veteran's residual surgical scarring associated with CAD status post CABG has been rated as noncompensable.,The Veteran's hypertension has required continuous management by medications but has never met the criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7101.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently rated at 10 percent and does not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on pure tone threshold average or speech discrimination rate.,The Veteran's chronic atrial fibrillation has been rated at 30 percent and factors warranting extraschedular consideration are neither shown nor alleged.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not show that the Veteran’s CAD, status post CABG, meets the criteria for a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 7017.,The Veteran's scar has been rated as noncompensable because it does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Codes 7801-7805.,The Veteran’s hypertension has required continuous management by medications but his blood pressure readings have never met the criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7101.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on pure tone threshold average or speech discrimination rate.,The Veteran's chronic atrial fibrillation has been rated at 30 percent and factors warranting extraschedular consideration are neither shown nor alleged.

Claimed conditions
Coronary artery disease (CAD), status post coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), Residual surgical scarring, status post CABG, Hypertension, Bilateral hearing loss, Chronic atrial fibrillation
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 22, 2019
Citation
19113141

Veterans Law Judge

JOHN J. CROWLEY

Decisions by this judge: 3,319 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19113141.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.