Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss has been denied.,The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus has been denied.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for high blood pressure has been remanded due to incomplete STRs and the need for private treatment records.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a skin condition, including cellulitis, boils and blisters, has been remanded due to inaccurate factual premises in the July 2015 VA examination and the need for an opinion on whether his skin condition is secondary to diabetes mellitus.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, including PTSD and depression, has been remanded due to the July 2015 examiner's failure to consider the Veteran's contentions regarding combat-related nightmares and delayed treatment.

The deciding factor: The Veteran’s bilateral hearing loss does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 6100.,To receive a higher evaluation, the Veteran’s diabetes mellitus would need to require regulation of activities with the intention of avoiding hypoglycemic episodes. The evidence fails to demonstrate that the Veteran's activities were regulated for this purpose.,The Veteran has not provided private treatment records related to his hypertension and STRs are incomplete. Further examination is needed to obtain these records.,The July 2015 examiner’s opinion was based on inaccurate factual premises, including a lack of cellulitis in the claims file and an incorrect note that there were no episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemia in the prior year. A new opinion is necessary.,The Veteran reported combat-related nightmares and depression for years after separation but did not seek treatment due to fear of losing his job. The July 2015 examiner failed to consider these contentions.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Diabetes Mellitus, High Blood Pressure, Skin Condition (including cellulitis, boils and blisters), Acquired Psychiatric Disability (including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Depression)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 12, 2019
Citation
19118079

Veterans Law Judge

A. S. CARACCIOLO

Decisions by this judge: 1,614 · Granted: 35% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19118079.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.