Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and esophageal cancer due to asbestos exposure. The Veteran's current hearing loss is not related to his in-service noise exposure, as there was no specific event linked to its onset. His tinnitus did not manifest within the one-year presumptive period or be otherwise related to service. Esophageal cancer is not considered related to asbestos exposure during service.,The Board denied service connection for esophageal cancer due to asbestos exposure. The Veteran's current diagnosis of esophageal cancer was found not to be linked to his in-service asbestos exposure, as there were no pre-existing diseases that predispose him to the condition.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not establish a nexus between the Veteran’s current hearing loss and service. The audiologist opined it is less likely than not related to service due to post-service employment and/or chemotherapy.,For tinnitus, there was no compensable degree of disability within one year after separation from service or established continuity of symptomatology. The VA examiner found that the Veteran's tinnitus is more likely caused by post-service employment and/or chemotherapy.,The Board concluded that esophageal cancer is not related to asbestos exposure during service. The VA examiner noted no pre-existing diseases in service that predispose to esophageal cancer, and the etiology of almost 90% of esophageal cancers in the United States results from other factors such as hereditary, GERD, Barrett’s Disease, history of smoking, alcohol consumption, and diets low in fruits and vegetables.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, esophageal cancer
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 19, 2019
Citation
19119834

Veterans Law Judge

R. FEINBERG

Decisions by this judge: 2,017 · Granted: 36% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19119834.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.