The Veteran's claim for service connection for osteosclerosis was denied as there is no evidence of a current diagnosis or in-service incurrence.,Service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability was also denied due to lack of evidence linking the condition to service.,For Crohn’s disease, an increased rating greater than 30 percent was denied. The Veteran's symptoms did not meet criteria for severe ulcerative colitis with numerous attacks and malnutrition.,The claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and sleep apnea were remanded as there is insufficient evidence to determine the validity of these claims.
The deciding factor: There was no current diagnosis of osteosclerosis or osteoporosis, and no in-service or post-service continuity of symptoms related to this condition. The Veteran's service treatment records did not indicate any osteosclerosis.,The Veteran’s audiometric findings during service were within normal limits for hearing loss disability criteria. There is no evidence linking the bilateral hearing loss disability to service.,The Veteran's Crohn’s disease was rated as 30 percent disabling, which is the maximum rating under DC 7323 (ulcerative colitis). The Veteran did not meet the criteria for a higher rating due to severe ulcerative colitis with numerous attacks and malnutrition.,There is insufficient evidence to determine if an acquired psychiatric disorder or sleep apnea are related to service. These claims were remanded.
- Claimed conditions
- osteosclerosis, bilateral hearing loss disability, Crohn’s disease status posthemicolectomy with scar, Sluder's neuralgia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 28, 2019
- Citation
- 19140481
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,030 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19140481.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus but has remanded the issue of service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability due to inadequate examination and reasoning.
- Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability and tinnitus, finding that there is no credible evidence linking these conditions to his active service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss disability and tinnitus due to errors in providing notice of his right to a pre-decisional hearing.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus but has remanded the claim of service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability due to a pre-decisional duty to assist error.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.