Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for a left ear hearing loss disability is denied.,Service connection is granted for the residuals of HPV, including residuals of cervical dysplasia and partial hysterectomy. The Board finds that the preponderance of evidence supports this finding.,The Veteran’s claim for service connection for hemorrhoids is remanded due to lack of medical examination or opinion regarding her current condition.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right foot disability is remanded as there is insufficient information on whether it was caused by the service-connected right ankle disability.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for partial hysterectomy is remanded as there is insufficient information on whether it was due to HPV or its complications.

The deciding factor: There are no audiometric test results consistent with a diagnosis of left ear hearing loss disability for VA compensation purposes. The Veteran did not have current left ear hearing loss disability for VA compensation purposes.,The preponderance of the evidence favors a finding that the Veteran’s HPV, to include residuals was incurred in or caused by service.,VA examination and opinion are needed on whether the Veteran has a possibly related hemorrhoids condition during service.,A VA examination is needed to determine if the right foot disability is possibly related to service or the service-connected right ankle disability. The examiner should also provide an opinion on whether the Veteran's right foot disability is worsened by her service-connected right ankle disability.,The Veteran’s partial hysterectomy was not caused by HPV, but it may be due to its complications.

Claimed conditions
left ear hearing loss, HPV (human papilloma virus), hemorrhoids, right foot disability, partial hysterectomy
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
May 31, 2019
Citation
19142077

Veterans Law Judge

JOHN Z. JONES

Decisions by this judge: 2,341 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19142077.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.