The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for bilateral hearing loss was withdrawn by the appellant.,The claim of service connection for right knee condition has been denied due to lack of new and material evidence since the January 2007 rating decision.,The reduction from 20 percent to 10 percent for residuals of right acromioclavicular separation with degenerative joint disease, major was improper as there was no actual improvement in the Veteran's condition.,The claim for a compensable rating for alopecia areata has been denied.,Service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability (PTSD) is remanded.
The deciding factor: The appellant withdrew their appeal on the issue of a higher initial rating for bilateral hearing loss during the December 2018 Board hearing.,The evidence submitted since the January 2007 rating decision did not relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim of service connection for right knee condition.,There was no actual improvement in the Veteran's residuals of right acromioclavicular separation with degenerative joint disease, major that would justify reducing the rating from 20 percent to 10 percent.,The evidence did not show loss of hair beyond the scalp as required for a compensable rating for alopecia areata.,Service connection for PTSD is remanded due to insufficient evidence.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hearing loss, right knee condition, acromioclavicular separation with degenerative joint disease, major, alopecia areata, acquired psychiatric disability (PTSD)
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 8, 2019
- Citation
- 19152638
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 940 · Granted: 21% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19152638.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral hearing loss, migraine headaches, and PTSD due to additional development of records and examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim, specifically needing an addendum opinion from a VA examiner. The Veteran will be asked to provide any missing records and former employers' information.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.