The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not shown during service or within one year of separation, and are therefore not service-connected.,Malaria is not a condition that can be presumed to have been incurred due to exposure to herbicides. The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of malaria.,Hypertension was not shown during service or within one year of separation, and is not service-connected.,Ulcerative colitis is not related to active service.,Metastatic rectal cancer is presumed to be due to the Veteran's active service.,Left upper extremity neuropathy, right upper extremity neuropathy, left lower extremity neuropathy, and right lower extremity neuropathy are all found to be related to the Veteran's active service.,PTSD was not diagnosed during service or within one year of separation. The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of PTSD.,An acquired psychiatric disorder, including adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressive disorder, is secondary to the Veteran’s service-connected rectal cancer.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's hearing loss and tinnitus were not shown during service or within one year of separation, and are therefore not service-connected. The first objective clinical documentation of hearing loss was over 40 years after service.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, malaria, hypertension, ulcerative colitis, metastatic rectal cancer, left upper extremity neuropathy, right upper extremity neuropathy, left lower extremity neuropathy, right lower extremity neuropathy
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 31, 2019
- Citation
- 19159165
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19159165.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to incomplete medical records and need for further examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.