Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has granted service connection for low back disability and bilateral hearing loss, finding that the evidence is in equipoise as to whether these conditions are related to service. Service connection was denied for diabetes mellitus and diabetic neuropathy of the lower extremities due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.,An increased rating for PFB residuals (pseudofolliculitis barbae) is remanded, as new examination findings may be necessary given changes in VA rating criteria.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's current low back disability and bilateral hearing loss are causally related to service due to the evidence of continuity of symptomatology and credible statements from the Veteran regarding his exposure to noise during service. Service connection was denied for diabetes mellitus and diabetic neuropathy as there is no competent evidence associating these conditions with service or another service-connected disability.,The Board noted that VA's duty to obtain medical examination or opinion has not been triggered due to lack of evidence suggesting the onset of diabetes mellitus and/or diabetic neuropathy in service. The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for PFB residuals is remanded as new examination findings may be necessary given changes in VA rating criteria.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Neuropathy of the Lower Extremities, Low Back Disability
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 8, 2019
Citation
19161399

Veterans Law Judge

T. MAINELLI

Decisions by this judge: 1,836 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19161399.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.