Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's right knee and low back disabilities are being remanded as the VA examiners did not adequately address whether they were caused or aggravated by his service-connected left knee disability.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is being remanded to determine if he has a current hearing loss disability, and its likely etiology.,The Veteran's tinnitus is being remanded to determine its likely etiology, including whether it was incurred in service.,The Veteran's psychiatric disabilities are being remanded as the VA examiners did not adequately address his request for treatment during service or any head injury therein.,The Veteran's TBI and migraine headaches are being remanded to determine their likely etiology.

The deciding factor: The VA examiners failed to provide adequate opinions regarding whether the Veteran's right knee and low back disabilities were caused or aggravated by his service-connected left knee disability, as required by law.,The VA examiner did not adequately address whether the Veteran has a current hearing loss disability and its likely etiology.,The VA examiner did not adequately address whether the Veteran's tinnitus was incurred in service or related to any other condition.,The VA examiners did not provide adequate opinions regarding the Veteran's request for treatment during service or any head injury therein, as required by law.,The VA examiner did not provide an opinion on the likely etiology of the Veteran's TBI and migraine headaches.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Low Back Disability, Migraine Headaches, Right Knee Disability, Tinnitus, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Variously Diagnosed Psychiatric Disability
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 13, 2019
Citation
19162374

Veterans Law Judge

GEORGE R. SENYK

Decisions by this judge: 2,699 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19162374.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.