Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss increased rating claim is remanded to obtain relevant treatment records and provide a new examination.,The Veteran's right fifth finger disability claim requires clarification due to the lack of an opinion on the etiology of his symptoms.,A VA examination is necessary for the left upper, right upper, and left lower extremities to determine if any current complaints are related to service.,The Veteran's psychiatric disorder (including PTSD, anxiety, and depression) claim requires a new examination and opinion due to inconsistencies in his reports and lack of support from STRs.,The Veteran's gastroesophageal disability (GERD), lumbar spine disability, and shifted pelvis claims require the retrieval of relevant VA treatment records and clarification on sources of treatment for these disabilities.,,

The deciding factor: To obtain relevant treatment records and provide a new examination to address functional impairment from bilateral hearing loss.,To clarify whether the Veteran's symptoms are related to service, including cryosurgery in service.,To determine if any current complaints of neurological disabilities are related to service, including leg cramps, burns, or previous hand symptoms.,To provide a new examination and opinion regarding the etiology of psychiatric disorders, considering inconsistencies in the Veteran's reports and lack of STRs supporting his claims.,To obtain relevant VA treatment records and clarify sources of treatment for gastroesophageal, lumbar spine, and pelvic disabilities.,,

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, right fifth finger disability, neurological disabilities of the bilateral upper and left lower extremities, psychiatric disorder (including PTSD, anxiety, and depression), gastroesophageal disability (GERD), lumbar spine disability, shifted pelvis
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 12, 2019
Citation
19170933

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19170933.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.