Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for bilateral hearing loss is denied.,Service connection for left knee joint osteoarthritis has been granted.,The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for a neck disability, bilateral hearing loss, and peripheral neuropathy in the upper and lower extremities.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for his service-connected bilateral hearing loss is being remanded.,Service connection for left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, right upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, and left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy are also being remanded.

The deciding factor: The effective date of the grant of service connection for bilateral hearing loss cannot be earlier than October 1, 2015 as it was received by VA on that date.,Left knee joint osteoarthritis is considered to have been aggravated during service and thus service connection can be granted.,Further examination and opinion are needed regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's neck disability, bilateral hearing loss, and peripheral neuropathy in the upper and lower extremities.,A new evaluation for the Veteran's service-connected bilateral hearing loss is required to determine its current severity.,Examination and opinion are also needed to determine if the Veteran's peripheral neuropathies are related to his military service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, left knee joint osteoarthritis, neck disability, left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, right upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 10, 2019
Citation
19178125

Veterans Law Judge

KRISTI L. GUNN

Decisions by this judge: 2,062 · Granted: 34% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19178125.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.