Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that additional development is needed to address the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including right ear hearing loss, an acquired psychiatric disorder, GERD, abdominal aortic aneurysm, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, respiratory disorders, vocal cord dysfunction, bilateral knee and shoulder disorders, lumbar spine disorder, and scars. The development includes obtaining service personnel records for the Veteran's periods of active duty and National Guard service, as well as verifying any qualifying periods of service.,The Board also notes that the Veteran has contended that his conditions are related to hazardous exposures during his period of active duty, including exposure to jet fuel and chemicals. The AOJ should attempt to verify these claims and obtain VA medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's conditions.

The deciding factor: The Board finds that additional development is needed to ensure all relevant service records are obtained and reviewed, as well as to address the Veteran's contentions regarding his exposure to hazardous materials during active duty.

Claimed conditions
Right ear hearing loss, Acquired psychiatric disorder, Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Type II diabetes mellitus, Hypertension, Obstructive sleep apnea, Respiratory disorder, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Vocal cord dysfunction, Bilateral knee disorder, Bilateral shoulder disorder, Lumbar spine disorder, Right ankle disorder, Rheumatoid arthritis, to include a bilateral hip disorder, Scars of the mid sternal and left lower extremity
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 8, 2019
Citation
19184800

Veterans Law Judge

J.W. ZISSIMOS

Decisions by this judge: 1,612 · Granted: 16% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19184800.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.