The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development of evidence regarding whether the Veteran's brain cancer (Pineoblastoma) was related to his in-service herbicide exposure. The VA must obtain a medical opinion on this issue.
The deciding factor: The VA failed to provide an adequate medical opinion addressing the relationship between the Veteran's in-service herbicide exposure and his diagnosed condition, Pineoblastoma.
- Claimed conditions
- Pineoblastoma
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 26, 2019
- Citation
- 19189254
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19189254.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.