The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions regarding whether the Veteran's Pineoblastoma was related to his in-service herbicide exposure. The claim is being returned for further development and an adequate opinion.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide a specific etiological opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's Pineoblastoma and his conceded in-service herbicide exposure, as required by previous Board remands.
- Claimed conditions
- Pineoblastoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 22, 2020
- Citation
- 20042246
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20042246.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the cause of the Veteran's death, specifically his Pineoblastoma. The case will be sent for further development including obtaining a dose estimate from VA and an opinion on whether the disease is related to service exposure to radiation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development of evidence regarding whether the Veteran's brain cancer (Pineoblastoma) was related to his in-service herbicide exposure. The VA must obtain a medical opinion on this issue.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.