Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's service connection claims for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus are being remanded due to the submission of new evidence that relates to the current disability element.,The Veteran's service connection claim for left knee disability is being remanded as there is new evidence suggesting a relationship between her in-service miscarriage and residuals, and her current condition.,The Veteran's service connection claims for bilateral plantar fasciitis are being remanded due to her in-service running activities which may have contributed to the development of her current foot conditions.,The Veteran's service connection claim for patellofemoral syndrome of the right knee is being remanded as there is new evidence suggesting a relationship between her in-service running activities and her current condition.,The Veteran's service connection claims for lumbar strain are being remanded due to the submission of new evidence that relates to the nexus element.

The deciding factor: New medical evidence has been received, which raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the service connection claim for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus.,The Veteran's in-service miscarriage may have contributed to her current left knee disability.,The Veteran's in-service running activities may have contributed to her current bilateral plantar fasciitis.,The Veteran's in-service running activities may have contributed to her current patellofemoral syndrome of the right knee.,New medical evidence has been received, which raises a reasonable possibility of substantiating the service connection claim for lumbar strain.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss, Left Knee Disability, Miscarriage or its Residuals, Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis, Patellofemoral Syndrome of the Right Knee, Lumbar Strain
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 26, 2019
Citation
19189603

Veterans Law Judge

Katherine Q. Forde

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19189603.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.