Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss disability, tinnitus, bilateral knee disorder, foot fungus disorder, hypertension (claimed as high blood pressure), and low back disorder have all been denied. The Board found no evidence of these conditions during service or within one year post-service.,There is no current evidence linking any of the Veteran's claimed disabilities to his active duty service.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not report hearing loss or tinnitus symptoms in service, and there was no objective medical evidence of a hearing loss disability during service. The VA examiner concluded that the Veteran’s tinnitus is due to presbycusis (normal aging).,Service treatment records showed normal knees upon separation, and arthritis was not noted within one year post-service. There were no manifestations of knee disorders or arthritis in service.,The Veteran did not report foot fungus symptoms during service, and there are no objective medical findings linking the condition to his active duty service. The Board found that the remote onset of the disorder is unrelated to service.,Hypertension was not noted upon separation, nor were any manifestations of hypertension within one year post-service. There is no evidence linking the Veteran's current hypertension to his active duty service.,The Veteran did not report low back symptoms during service, and there are no objective medical findings linking arthritis (a chronic disease) to his active duty service.

Claimed conditions
Bilateral Hearing Loss Disability, Tinnitus, Bilateral Knee Disorder, Foot Fungus Disorder, Hypertension (claimed as High Blood Pressure), Low Back Disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
January 6, 2020
Citation
20000731

Veterans Law Judge

H. N. SCHWARTZ

Decisions by this judge: 2,480 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20000731.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.