Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus have been reopened due to the submission of new evidence. The claim for a heart condition as due to exposure to herbicides has not been reopened.,Service connection is granted for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus.

The deciding factor: The new evidence submitted since the February 2013 final rating decision includes statements from the Veteran, VA memorandum regarding the Veteran’s stressors and his potential exposure to herbicides, VA medical center (VAMC) records, private medical records, and copies of the Veteran's service treatment records (STRs) and military personnel records. This evidence is sufficient to reopen the Veteran’s claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, bilateral hearing loss, and tinnitus.,The new evidence submitted since the February 2013 final rating decision includes a private audiological report which stated that his bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were more likely than not related to his active duty military service. This evidence is sufficient to reopen the Veteran’s claims for service connection bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus.

Claimed conditions
Acquired Psychiatric Disorder, Bilateral Hearing Loss, Tinnitus
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 8, 2020
Citation
20001515

Veterans Law Judge

JOHN Z. JONES

Decisions by this judge: 2,341 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20001515.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.