Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeal for service connection for a cerebrovascular accident has been withdrawn.,Service connection for hypertension is denied as there is no in-service event or continuous symptomatology related to the condition.,Service connection for bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus is denied due to lack of evidence showing current disability within VA standards.,The Veteran's bilateral shoulder disorder, osteoarthritis impacting multiple joints, and erectile dysfunction are remanded for further evaluation.,Further medical examination is needed to determine if the Veteran’s conditions are related to service or other service-connected disabilities.

The deciding factor: The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding cerebrovascular accident. Service connection for hypertension was denied due to lack of in-service event and continuous symptomatology. Bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus were not shown within VA standards.,Further medical examination is required to determine if the Veteran's conditions are related to service or other service-connected disabilities.

Claimed conditions
Cerebrovascular Accident (Stroke), Hypertension, Bilateral Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Bilateral Shoulder Disorder, Osteoarthritis (Impacting Bilateral Feet, Arms, Ankles, Knees, Wrists, Cervical Spine, Low Back, and Bilateral Hips), Erectile Dysfunction
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 9, 2020
Citation
20001893

Veterans Law Judge

H.M. WALKER

Decisions by this judge: 2,569 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20001893.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.