Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss is denied.,The Veteran's previously denied claim of service connection for hypertension has been reopened, but the issue remains remanded due to insufficient evidence on whether his hypertension was caused or aggravated by diabetes mellitus.,The Veteran's eye disability and erectile dysfunction claims are both remanded as they are inextricably intertwined with the hypertension claim.,Service connection for erectile dysfunction is also remanded.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss under VA regulations.,There is insufficient evidence to determine whether the Veteran's hypertension was caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and further examination is needed.,The eye disability and erectile dysfunction claims are remanded as they are inextricably intertwined with the hypertension claim.,Service connection for erectile dysfunction cannot be determined without additional information regarding its relationship to the Veteran’s service-connected conditions.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, hypertension, eye disability, erectile dysfunction
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 10, 2020
Citation
20002198

Veterans Law Judge

T. REYNOLDS

Decisions by this judge: 2,077 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20002198.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.