Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Board has dismissed the claim of entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).,The claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, skin cancer, an eye disability, PTSD, and hypertension are remanded due to the need for additional development.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD is also remanded as it involves a mental health condition that may be related to his claimed skin disability.,The Board has not addressed the issue of entitlement to service connection for a right eye disability due to 38 U.S.C. § 1151, which was referred to the AOJ.

The deciding factor: The Veteran requested to withdraw from appeal his claim of entitlement to TDIU prior to the Board's decision.,Further VA examination is needed for bilateral hearing loss and skin cancer due to potential current disability and service connection.,VA mental health examination is required as there are claims involving a psychiatric condition, including PTSD and depression.,The Veteran’s right eye disability may be related to his claimed skin disability. Further investigation into the etiology of this claim is needed.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, skin cancer, eye disability (including a nerve disorder affecting the right eye), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), acquired psychiatric disorder other than PTSD, including depression and anxiety
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 21, 2020
Citation
20004548

Veterans Law Judge

JACQUELINE E. MONROE

Decisions by this judge: 2,196 · Granted: 17% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20004548.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.