Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is granted as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus. The Veteran's bilateral tinnitus remains at a maximum schedular rating of 10%. A 20% rating for diabetes mellitus type II is granted from July 7, 2010 to November 21, 2011; and a 40% rating is granted from November 21, 2011. The Veteran's service connection claims for right shoulder disability, bilateral hearing loss, hypertension, and bilateral knee disability are remanded. An increased rating for PTSD and cataracts associated with diabetes mellitus type II is also remanded.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran’s erectile dysfunction was aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus, granting service connection for this condition as secondary to diabetes. The maximum schedular rating of 10% for bilateral tinnitus remains unchanged. For diabetes mellitus type II, a higher rating is granted from November 21, 2011, based on the requirement of insulin and regulation of activities.

Claimed conditions
erectile dysfunction, bilateral hearing loss, hypertension, bilateral knee disability, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), diabetes mellitus type II, diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity, diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity, diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity, diabetic neuropathy of the right lower extremity
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
January 24, 2020
Citation
20006205

Veterans Law Judge

S. L. Kennedy

Decisions by this judge: 2,435 · Granted: 22% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20006205.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.