Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied as he does not have a current disability.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a left-hand index finger disability is denied as there is no evidence of a current diagnosis or treatment related to this condition.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for headaches and cervical spine disorder are remanded due to inadequate medical opinions in previous examinations.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a cervical spine disorder is also remanded.

The deciding factor: There is no current evidence of bilateral hearing loss meeting the criteria for VA purposes, as defined by regulation. The Veteran does not have a current disability that meets the definition of a disability eligible for service connection.,The Veteran's left-hand index finger disability claim lacks competent medical evidence of a current diagnosis or treatment related to this condition during the appeal period.,Previous VA examinations did not consider whether the Veteran’s headaches and cervical spine disorder are due to his motor vehicle accident while on active duty, which is an important factor in determining service connection. The opinions from these VA examiners are inadequate for the purpose of determining service connection.,The previous VA examination did not address whether the Veteran's cervical spine disorder is related to his motor vehicle accident during active duty. Therefore, the opinion is inadequate for the purpose of determining service connection.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, left-hand index finger disability, headaches, cervical spine disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 18, 2020
Citation
20026924

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20026924.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.