Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for service connection have been reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. However, his claim for bilateral hearing loss remains denied as he does not meet the VA standards for a current disability.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for lumbar spine disorder, elbow disorder, wrist disorder, hip disorder, knee disorder, left ankle disorder, right ankle disorder (other than right ankle sprain), shoulder disorder, and acquired psychiatric disorder have been remanded due to insufficient evidence of a nexus between his current conditions and service.,The Veteran's claim for a cervical spine disorder has also been remanded as no VA examination addressing the direct or secondary theory of entitlement was conducted.,His claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for shin splints, left leg and right leg have been remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran does not meet the VA standards for a current disability of bilateral hearing loss. The evidence submitted is new but not material as it fails to establish that he has a current diagnosis of bilateral hearing loss.,There is insufficient evidence linking the Veteran's current conditions to service, including his parachuting experience and motor vehicle accident. Further examination is needed to determine if there is a nexus between his current conditions and service.,The Veteran's cervical spine disorder may be related to his parachute jumps or a prior injury during Reserve service. A new VA examination is required to address this theory of entitlement.,There is insufficient evidence linking the Veteran's shin splints to his service-connected disabilities. Further examination is needed to determine if there is a nexus between his current conditions and service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral knee disorder, lumbar spine disorder, bilateral hearing loss, cervical spine disorder, left ankle disorder, right ankle disorder (other than right ankle sprain), bilateral elbow disorder, bilateral wrist disorder, bilateral hip disorder, bilateral shoulder disorder, acquired psychiatric disorder (to include anxiety, adjustment disorder, and depression)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 11, 2020
Citation
20039888

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20039888.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.