Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has decided that the Veteran's left eye condition, including as due to presumed exposure to herbicide agents, requires further examination and opinion.

The deciding factor: The Board cannot make a fully-informed decision without an examination of the Veteran’s left eye condition and its relation to his military service and presumed exposure to herbicide agents.

Claimed conditions
central retinal artery occlusion, ischemic stroke
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Burn pits / airborne hazards
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
September 15, 2020
Citation
20060535

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20060535.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.