The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a compensable initial rating and a rating in excess of 10 percent for pseudotumor cerebri with optic disc edema, papilledema due to conflicting findings regarding visual field impairment.
The deciding factor: There is a discrepancy between the finding of bilateral visual field defect during the August 2011 VA examination and the examiner's note that there is no decrease in visual acuity or other visual impairment. The Board has therefore remanded for an addendum opinion to reconcile this issue.
- Claimed conditions
- pseudotumor cerebri with optic disc edema, papilledema
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 30, 2020
- Citation
- 20070727
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,287 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20070727.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for initial compensable disability rating and a higher rating for pseudotumor cerebri with optic disc edema, papilledema are being remanded due to the need for additional VA and private treatment records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's initial compensable rating for pseudotumor cerebri with optic disc edema, papilledema has been increased to 10 percent effective April 1, 2019. The Board is remanding the case due to outstanding treatment records that need to be obtained and reviewed.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.