The Veteran's claims for initial compensable disability rating and a higher rating for pseudotumor cerebri with optic disc edema, papilledema are being remanded due to the need for additional VA and private treatment records.
The deciding factor: Additional medical evidence is needed to properly evaluate the Veteran’s bilateral eye disability prior to April 1, 2019 and from April 1, 2019.
- Claimed conditions
- pseudotumor cerebri with optic disc edema, papilledema
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 15, 2021
- Citation
- 21022353
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21022353.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for a compensable initial rating and a rating in excess of 10 percent for pseudotumor cerebri with optic disc edema, papilledema due to conflicting findings regarding visual field impairment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's initial compensable rating for pseudotumor cerebri with optic disc edema, papilledema has been increased to 10 percent effective April 1, 2019. The Board is remanding the case due to outstanding treatment records that need to be obtained and reviewed.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.