The Veteran's claim for service connection for a bilateral hearing loss disability was denied as there is no evidence of such a disability during the applicable period.,For left leg cold injury residuals, an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent prior to October 4, 2012, and in excess of 20 percent from October 4, 2012, to December 6, 2014, was denied. The claim for a higher rating after December 6, 2014, was also denied.,For peripheral arterial disease of the left leg as a residual of cold injury, an initial evaluation in excess of 20 percent was denied.
The deciding factor: The Veteran did not have bilateral hearing loss considered to be a disability for VA purposes during any part of the applicable period. The evidence showed arthralgia or other pain, numbness and cold sensitivity as residuals of left leg cold injury prior to October 4, 2012, and from October 4, 2012, to December 6, 2014, with nail abnormalities. However, there was no evidence of Raynaud’s Syndrome, tissue loss, color changes, locally impaired sensation, hyperhidrosis, or X-ray abnormalities that would warrant a higher evaluation.,The Veteran's left leg cold injury residuals did not manifest by more than arthralgia or other pain, numbness or cold sensitivity prior to October 4, 2012. However, from October 4, 2012, to December 6, 2014, there was evidence of nail abnormalities and X-ray abnormality (degenerative joint disease) that warranted a 20 percent evaluation.,For peripheral arterial disease of the left leg as a residual of cold injury, the Veteran's ankle/brachial index was 0.85 in 2009, which did not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 20 percent.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral hearing loss, Left leg cold injury residuals (including arthralgia or other pain, numbness and cold sensitivity), Peripheral arterial disease of the left leg as a residual of cold injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 10, 2020
- Citation
- 20072352
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,454 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20072352.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for a low back disorder was reopened, and his claims for increased ratings of bilateral knee instability were granted. His hearing loss claim was denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeals of the initial ratings for his service-connected chronic cough and bilateral hearing loss are remanded due to procedural errors in the evidentiary record.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including bilateral pes planus with hammer toes, hallux valgus and degenerative arthritis, sleep apnea, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and bilateral kidney cysts, rendered him unable to secure or follow gainful employment. The Board granted the TDIU based on these conditions.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities (bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus) do not prevent him from securing and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.