Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's right eye condition is remanded for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed condition.,The Veteran's bilateral sensorineural hearing loss is remanded for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed condition, including whether it was caused by in-service acoustic trauma.,The Veteran's lung condition is remanded for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed condition, including exposure to herbicides, asbestos, or jet fuel fumes during service.,The Veteran's sleep apnea is remanded for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his claimed condition, including exposure to herbicides, asbestos, or jet fuel fumes during service.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability to include PTSD is remanded for additional development to verify in-service stressors.

The deciding factor: A VA examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran’s right eye condition due to its complexity and potential relationship to service exposure.,A VA examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, including whether it was caused by in-service acoustic trauma.,A VA examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran’s lung condition due to his claimed exposures during service.,A VA examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran’s sleep apnea, including exposure to herbicides, asbestos, or jet fuel fumes during service.,Additional development is needed to verify the Veteran's in-service stressors for his acquired psychiatric disability to include PTSD.

Claimed conditions
right eye condition, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, lung condition, sleep apnea, acquired psychiatric disability to include PTSD
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 20, 2020
Citation
20074615

Veterans Law Judge

L. M. BARNARD

Decisions by this judge: 2,456 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20074615.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.