The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss has been rated as noncompensable, and the Board finds that this rating is correct.,The Veteran's PTSD with TBI was previously rated at 50 percent prior to December 9, 2013, and at 70 percent thereafter. The RO must address whether a higher rating is warranted for the period from December 9, 2013, to present, excluding periods of temporary total ratings.,The Veteran's left foot pes planus was previously rated as noncompensable prior to May 18, 2018. The RO must address whether a higher rating is warranted for the period from May 18, 2018, to present.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss has been rated as noncompensable based on the results of his audiological evaluations, which did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating under VA regulations.,The RO must address whether a higher rating is warranted for PTSD with TBI during the period from December 9, 2013, to present, excluding periods of temporary total ratings. The Veteran's previous ratings were based on his service-connected PTSD with TBI and did not consider other factors that may affect his disability.,The RO must address whether a higher rating is warranted for left foot pes planus during the period from May 18, 2018, to present. The Veteran's previous rating was based on his service-connected left foot pes planus and did not consider any additional diagnoses or complications that may affect his disability.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral hearing loss, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with traumatic brain injury (TBI), left foot pes planus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 7, 2021
- Citation
- 21001386
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21001386.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of bilateral hearing loss and a ruptured right ear drum was dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss was noted upon entry into active duty service and did not increase in severity during service. Therefore, it denied his claim for service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for bilateral hearing loss, migraine headaches, and PTSD due to additional development of records and examination.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim, specifically needing an addendum opinion from a VA examiner. The Veteran will be asked to provide any missing records and former employers' information.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.