The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for epididymitis with bilateral epididymal cysts and TDIU due to service-connected disabilities has been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating for his service-connected conditions, as they did not meet the criteria for a 30 percent rating under DC 7525.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's symptoms associated with his service-connected epididymitis disability more closely paralleled the type of symptoms described in the criteria for the currently assigned 10 percent disability rating. The evidence did not reflect recurrent urinary tract infections or poor renal function related to his service-connected condition, which would warrant a higher rating.
- Claimed conditions
- epididymitis with bilateral epididymal cysts, ED
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- February 2, 2021
- Citation
- 21005799
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21005799.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty-to-assist error, specifically failing to obtain an opinion on whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities contributed to his accidental drowning death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and opinions regarding his diagnosed conditions, including mental health disorders, gastrointestinal issues, respiratory problems, arthritis, neuropathy, sleep apnea, erectile dysfunction, and headaches. The examination will also address whether any of these conditions were caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the issue of the reasonableness of agent fees awarded to R.B. based on past-due benefits awarded in a September 2019 Rating Decision due to claims processing defect.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for irritable bowel syndrome, erectile dysfunction, and sinusitis due to a lack of evidence showing these conditions were incurred or aggravated during his military service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.