Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for service connection for various disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional development and examination.,The Veteran's left foot disability is being remanded as there was insufficient consideration of his reported in-service injury and pain.,The Veteran's left ankle disability is being remanded due to inadequate consideration of his reported in-service injury and pain, as well as the lack of a thorough discussion of aggravation by service-connected tinnitus.,The Veteran's lumbar spine disability is being remanded because the examiner did not address whether the current condition was aggravated by an in-service injury or if there was any connection to the Veteran’s symptomatology since service.,The Veteran's dermatological condition (actinic keratosis) is being remanded as the VA examiner did not consider a letter from his treating dermatologist regarding the potential causation of the condition during service.

The deciding factor: Further development is necessary to address the Veteran’s claims for service connection due to incomplete evaluations and consideration of his reported in-service noise exposure, injuries, and symptomatology.,The left foot disability requires a new examination as it was not adequately addressed regarding the Veteran's reported in-service injury and pain.,The left ankle disability needs a new examination because the examiner did not address whether the current condition is aggravated by service-connected tinnitus or if there was any connection to the Veteran’s symptomatology since service.,The lumbar spine disability requires a new examination as it was not adequately addressed regarding the potential aggravation of an in-service injury and the connection to the Veteran's post-service symptoms.,The dermatological condition (actinic keratosis) needs a new examination because the VA examiner did not consider the letter from the Veteran’s treating dermatologist regarding the potential causation during service.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, left foot disability, left ankle disability, lumbar spine disability, dermatological condition (actinic keratosis)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 11, 2021
Citation
21014229

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21014229.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.