Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service-connected.,The Veteran’s GERD may be related to his military service and exposure to chemicals in service. Further examination and opinion are needed.,The Veteran's back disability may be related to his military service and exposure to chemicals in service. Further examination and opinion are needed.,The Veteran's bilateral knee disability may be related to his military service and exposure to chemicals in service. Further examination and opinion are needed.,The Veteran's neck disability may be related to his military service and exposure to chemicals in service. Further examination and opinion are needed.,The Veteran's right elbow disability may be related to his military service and exposure to chemicals in service. Further examination and opinion are needed.,Further examination and opinion are needed for the Veteran’s bilateral hearing loss.

The deciding factor: Reasonable doubt is resolved in favor of the Veteran regarding tinnitus as he has provided competent, credible, and probative statements regarding specific noise exposure during service.,The earliest records of treatment for GERD are from 2003. Without further evidence, it is less likely that his GERD is related to military service.,Without further comprehensive physical testing, laboratory tests, and/or satisfactory medical evidence, the VA examiner would be unable to provide an opinion without resorting to mere speculation.,The earliest records of treatment for bilateral knee disability are from 2003. Without further evidence, it is less likely that his bilateral knee disability is related to military service.,Without further comprehensive physical testing, laboratory tests, and/or satisfactory medical evidence, the VA examiner would be unable to provide an opinion without resorting to mere speculation.,The earliest records of treatment for right elbow disability are from 2003. Without further evidence, it is less likely that his right elbow disability is related to military service.,Further examination and opinion are needed as there are no current audiological results in the claims file.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, GERD, back disability, bilateral knee disability, neck disability, right elbow disability, bilateral hearing loss
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 16, 2021
Citation
21015194

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21015194.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.