Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's right ear hearing loss has been rated at Level I throughout the appeal period.,The claims for service connection of neck condition and HTN are being remanded due to new evidence having been received.,Service connection is being granted for Type II diabetes mellitus (DM2) as secondary to HTN.,HTN is being remanded due to insufficient rationale provided by the examiner.,Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is being remanded due to insufficient rationale provided by the examiner.,The Veteran's left ear hearing loss claim is being remanded for further review of the audiometry records in his service treatment records.,Service connection for neck condition is being remanded as there was no consideration of the Veteran's lay report.

The deciding factor: There is insufficient evidence to warrant a compensable rating for right ear hearing loss.,The claims are being remanded due to new evidence having been received and VA examinations arranged.,The examiner did not consider all relevant medical studies, including the STRs that document HTN.,The examiner did not provide sufficient rationale for dismissing the elevated blood pressure readings in the STRs.,The examiner did not consider the Veteran's lay report of his neck condition history.,There are insufficient audiometry records to determine if there was a significant threshold shift between enlistment and separation.,The examiner did not consider the Veteran's lay report of his neck condition history.

Claimed conditions
Right ear hearing loss, Type II diabetes mellitus (DM2), Hypertension (HTN), Ischemic heart disease (IHD), Neck condition
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 22, 2021
Citation
A21018596

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A21018596.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.