The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a defective dental bridge, finding that there was no evidence of VA negligence or fault in causing any additional disability.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner concluded that the Veteran did not have any additional disability resulting from VA dental care and found no evidence linking the defects in her dental bridge to VA's actions.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of natural teeth, periodontal gum disease, tongue scarring, facial deformity, involuntary drooling and spitting
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 3, 2021
- Citation
- 21026737
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 21026737.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for periodontal gum disease, maxillofacial loss, and upper/lower tooth loss as the evidence did not support a finding of a compensable dental disability resulting from in-service trauma or bone disease.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's facial deformity, claimed as residuals of dental surgery, is granted service connection. The Board found that the current disability is etiologically related to in-service tooth #3 extraction and subsequent infection requiring surgery.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional examination and opinion regarding whether the Veteran's current facial deformity is related to his in-service tooth extraction.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for glaucoma and ischemic heart disease has been dismissed due to the Veteran's withdrawal of these claims.,Tinnitus, diabetes mellitus type II, peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity, and peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity have all been granted service connection. The Veteran's hypertension and a skin disability (to include chloracne) are being remanded for further development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.