The Veteran's facial deformity, claimed as residuals of dental surgery, is granted service connection. The Board found that the current disability is etiologically related to in-service tooth #3 extraction and subsequent infection requiring surgery.
The deciding factor: The VA examination confirmed the Veteran's testimony regarding his long-standing symptoms and diagnosis of a facial deformity, which was linked to the in-service dental surgeries.
- Claimed conditions
- facial deformity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 17, 2021
- Citation
- 21075021
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21075021.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional examination and opinion regarding whether the Veteran's current facial deformity is related to his in-service tooth extraction.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a defective dental bridge, finding that there was no evidence of VA negligence or fault in causing any additional disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The veteran seeks service connection for various conditions allegedly related to exposure to ionizing radiation during military service. He also wishes to reopen his claim of entitlement to service connection for a hernia disorder. The claims are being remanded due to the unavailability of his service medical and personnel records, as well as other pertinent treatment records.
- Denied
The Board finds that the preponderance of evidence does not support a finding that the veteran's post-surgical residuals were unexpected or unforeseeable results of his July 1985 surgery. The VA treatment was deemed proper and informed consent was provided.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.