Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for an earlier effective date and increased rating for tinnitus, as well as his claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss are denied. The Board has also remanded the issues of service connection for a respiratory disability and chest boils due to presumed exposure to herbicide agents in Vietnam.,The Veteran's TDIU claim is also remanded because it may be significantly impacted by the outcome of his other claims, particularly those concerning his hearing loss and respiratory disabilities.

The deciding factor: The effective date for service connection cannot be earlier than May 15, 2018 as there was no indication that a claim for these conditions was filed within one year of separation from service. The Veteran's intent to file claims for hearing loss and tinnitus was not received until May 15, 2018.,The Veteran's tinnitus already has the maximum permissible schedular rating (10%) and there are no additional manifestations or effects that would warrant a higher rating under any other diagnostic code. The Board cannot rate this disability under any other DC as it is rated under DC 6260, which specifically addresses recurrent tinnitus.,The Veteran's hearing loss claim requires an additional VA examination to obtain valid audiological results due to severe cerumen impaction noted in the August 2018 VA audiological examination. The Board cannot make a fully informed decision without these updated findings.,VA and private treatment records do not discuss the etiology of the Veteran's respiratory disability or chest boils, including whether related to his presumed exposure to herbicide agents while serving in Vietnam. Medical comment is needed to determine if these disabilities are at least as likely as not attributable to service.

Claimed conditions
Tinnitus, Hearing Loss
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 20, 2021
Citation
21030920

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21030920.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.