Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's hearing loss is remanded for a VA examination to determine if it was aggravated by service and whether any increase in severity was due to its natural progression.,The Veteran's bilateral foot disability is remanded for a VA examination to determine if it was aggravated by service and whether any increase in severity was due to its natural progression. Additional steps are needed to verify the inservice injury that led to his current condition.,The Veteran's low back disability is remanded for a VA examination to determine if it began during service, manifested within one year after discharge, or is related to service. Further steps are needed to obtain in-service treatment records and verify stressors.,The Veteran's bilateral knee disability is remanded for a VA examination to determine if it began during service, manifested within one year after discharge, or is related to service. Further steps are needed to obtain in-service treatment records and verify the inservice injury.,The Veteran's asthma is remanded for a VA examination to determine if it was diagnosed while in service and whether any increase in severity is due to his service-connected ankle disabilities.,The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability (including PTSD and depression) is remanded for a VA examination to determine if it began during service, manifested within one year after discharge, or is related to service. Further steps are needed to verify stressors.

The deciding factor: The Board finds that the current evidence does not provide sufficient information to make a determination on whether the Veteran's hearing loss was aggravated by service and whether any increase in severity was due to its natural progression.,The Board finds that the current evidence does not provide sufficient information to make a determination on whether the Veteran's bilateral foot disability was aggravated by service and whether any increase in severity was due to its natural progression. Additional steps are needed to verify the inservice injury that led to his current condition.,The Board finds that the current evidence does not provide sufficient information to make a determination on whether the Veteran's low back disability began during service, manifested within one year after discharge, or is related to service. Further steps are needed to obtain in-service treatment records and verify stressors.,The Board finds that the current evidence does not provide sufficient information to make a determination on whether the Veteran's bilateral knee disability began during service, manifested within one year after discharge, or is related to service. Further steps are needed to obtain in-service treatment records and verify the inservice injury.,The Board finds that the current evidence does not provide sufficient information to make a determination on whether the Veteran's asthma was diagnosed while in service and whether any increase in severity is due to his service-connected ankle disabilities.,The Board finds that the current evidence does not provide sufficient information to make a determination on whether the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disability (including PTSD and depression) began during service, manifested within one year after discharge, or is related to service. Further steps are needed to verify stressors.

Claimed conditions
Hearing loss, Bilateral foot disability, Low back disability, Bilateral knee disability, Asthma, Acquired psychiatric disability (including PTSD and depression)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 27, 2021
Citation
21065689

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 21065689.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.