The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for male infertility, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between his current condition and his military service or any service-connected disabilities.
The deciding factor: The medical opinions provided did not establish a clear and specific etiology of the Veteran's male infertility related to his military service or any service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- male infertility
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 13, 2022
- Citation
- 22001993
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22001993.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for male infertility and erectile dysfunction as secondary to a service connected acquired psychiatric disability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the veteran's claims for a higher rating of PTSD with ADHD and service connection for male infertility. The VA must schedule new examinations to assess these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for male infertility, residuals of deviated nasal septum, and low back condition due to new evidence submitted after the July 2023 rating decision. The Court granted a JMPR that found the Board erred in not considering the PACT Act and VA medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's male infertility, which may be related to service or his service-connected conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.