The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's male infertility, which may be related to service or his service-connected conditions.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for an addendum VA medical opinion to address the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed male infertility, including its relation to service and/or service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- male infertility
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 29, 2024
- Citation
- A24069479
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,432 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24069479.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for male infertility and erectile dysfunction as secondary to a service connected acquired psychiatric disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the veteran's claims for a higher rating of PTSD with ADHD and service connection for male infertility. The VA must schedule new examinations to assess these conditions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for male infertility, residuals of deviated nasal septum, and low back condition due to new evidence submitted after the July 2023 rating decision. The Court granted a JMPR that found the Board erred in not considering the PACT Act and VA medical opinions.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for male infertility, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between his current condition and his military service or any service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.