Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for bilateral hearing loss service connection is denied.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus type II is granted based on presumed exposure to herbicide agents while stationed at U-Tapao Air Force Base in Thailand.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss must be remanded for an updated VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction secondary to diabetes mellitus type II is remanded for a nexus opinion.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities are both remanded for a VA examination and medical opinion.,The Veteran's claims for an earlier effective date for bilateral hearing loss, service connection for erectile dysfunction secondary to diabetes mellitus type II, and service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities are all remanded.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence in the record supporting a claim for an earlier effective date for bilateral hearing loss prior to September 16, 2013.,The Veteran's service records show exposure to herbicide agents while stationed at U-Tapao Air Force Base in Thailand. Service connection for diabetes mellitus type II is presumed based on this exposure.,A VA examination is needed to determine the current severity of the Veteran's bilateral hearing loss and assign a compensable rating.,The Veteran has asserted that his erectile dysfunction is caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II. A nexus opinion is needed to determine if there is any connection between these conditions.,A VA examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of any peripheral neuropathy symptoms, including whether they are related to diabetes mellitus type II.,All claims for an earlier effective date or service connection must be remanded as new evidence may support a finding in favor of the Veteran.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, diabetes mellitus type II, erectile dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 26, 2022
Citation
22004226

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22004226.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.