Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The application to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for bilateral hearing loss is denied.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for tinnitus. The claim for service connection for tinnitus is granted.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for cervical degenerative arthritis. The claims regarding the Veteran's cervical degenerative arthritis and low back condition are remanded for de novo review on the merits.,New and material evidence has been received to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for low back condition. The claims regarding the Veteran's cervical degenerative arthritis and low back condition are remanded for de novo review on the merits.,The application to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for right leg condition is remanded.,The application to reopen a claim of entitlement to service connection for left leg condition is remanded.

The deciding factor: New and material evidence has not been received within one year of the March 1994 denial regarding bilateral hearing loss, as the Veteran did not appeal this decision.,The Veteran's testimony in September 2021 was considered new and material evidence for tinnitus, as it establishes a nexus between his military service and tinnitus.,New and material evidence has been received since the October 2009 denial regarding cervical degenerative arthritis and low back condition. The claims are remanded for de novo review on the merits due to VA's duty to assist in obtaining relevant records from SSA and Gateway Spine and Joint.,New and material evidence has been received since the October 2009 denial regarding cervical degenerative arthritis and low back condition. The claims are remanded for de novo review on the merits due to VA's duty to assist in obtaining relevant records from SSA and Gateway Spine and Joint.,The Veteran testified that he has had right leg conditions related to his back disability since service, warranting a remand for further evaluation.,The Veteran testified that he has had left leg conditions related to his back disability since service, warranting a remand for further evaluation.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, cervical degenerative arthritis, low back condition
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 1, 2022
Citation
22005349

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22005349.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.