Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's petition to reopen the claim of service connection for thyroid cancer has been granted. The Board finds that new and material evidence was received after a final decision, allowing the reopening of this claim.,Service connection is being remanded for variously diagnosed heart disability (including pulmonary hypertension and tricuspid valve regurgitation), variously diagnosed skin disability (Chloracne), bilateral hearing loss disability, right upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, and left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy. The appeal will be returned to the Board after completion of development.,The Veteran's service connection claim for a variety of skin disabilities is being remanded due to lack of evidence related to exposure to herbicide agents. Further examination may be required to determine if any current skin disability is related to military service.

The deciding factor: The new and material evidence received after the final decision in December 2015 supports reopening the claim for thyroid cancer.,Service connection will be remanded as there are insufficient medical records to establish a link between the Veteran's current heart disabilities, skin disability, hearing loss, peripheral neuropathy, and military service. Further examination may be required to determine if any current condition is related to military service.,The claim for variously diagnosed skin disability (Chloracne) will be remanded as there are insufficient medical records to establish a link between the Veteran's current skin disability and exposure to herbicide agents during his military service.

Claimed conditions
Thyroid cancer, Heart disability, Skin disability, Bilateral hearing loss disability, Right upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, Left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 9, 2022
Citation
22007403

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22007403.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.