Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's lung disability claim is denied as there is no current diagnosis of a lung disability.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss claim is granted based on in-service noise exposure, but not related to service due to aggravation by post-service noise exposure.,The Veteran's cirrhosis of the liver claim is denied as there is no current diagnosis of a liver disability.

The deciding factor: There is no current evidence of a lung disability and the medical opinion does not support a finding that any current lung disability is related to service. The December 2013 VA examiner concluded the Veteran's claimed lung disability was less likely than not incurred in or caused by his service.,The Veteran has hearing loss, but it did not meet the criteria for a disability under VA guidelines and therefore does not qualify as a disability for purposes of service connection. However, the December 2013 VA examiner opined that the current right ear hearing loss was aggravated by military noise exposure during service.,There is no evidence or contentions of continuity of symptomatology, or a suggestion of nexus to service, or specific contentions as to in-service incidents for cirrhosis of the liver. The Veteran's post-service treatment records reveal elevated liver enzyme levels but no diagnosis of a liver disability.

Claimed conditions
lung disability, bilateral hearing loss, cirrhosis of the liver
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
February 10, 2022
Citation
22007790

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 22007790.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.