Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records and examination.,The Veteran's claim for a back disorder secondary to bilateral pes planus is also remanded as there is insufficient evidence regarding the nature and progression of his foot condition during service.,The Veteran's claim for bilateral hearing loss is also remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records and examination.,The Veteran's claim for asbestosis is also remanded as there are outstanding VA treatment records that may be relevant to his case.,The Veteran's claim for sleep apnea is also remanded as there are outstanding VA treatment records that may be relevant to his case.,The Veteran's claim for a heart disorder is also remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records and examination.,The Veteran's claim for hypertension is also remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records and examination.,The Veteran's claim for diabetes mellitus is also remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records and examination.,The Veteran's claim for stress fractures is also remanded as there are outstanding VA treatment records that may be relevant to his case.

The deciding factor: Additional evidence, including VA and private treatment records, needs to be obtained in order to fully evaluate the Veteran's claims. The Board finds it necessary to ensure all possible development has been accomplished before proceeding further with these matters.,The nature and progression of the Veteran's back disorder secondary to bilateral pes planus need to be clarified through additional medical examination and evaluation. This will help determine if there is a link between his service-connected foot condition and his current back issues.,The nature and progression of the Veteran's hearing loss need to be clarified through additional medical examination and evaluation. This will help determine if there is a link between his service-connected conditions and his current hearing loss.,Additional evidence, including VA and private treatment records, needs to be obtained in order to fully evaluate the Veteran's claim for asbestosis. The Board finds it necessary to ensure all possible development has been accomplished before proceeding further with this matter.,Additional evidence, including VA and private treatment records, needs to be obtained in order to fully evaluate the Veteran's claim for sleep apnea. The Board finds it necessary to ensure all possible development has been accomplished before proceeding further with this matter.,The nature and progression of the Veteran's heart disorder need to be clarified through additional medical examination and evaluation. This will help determine if there is a link between his service-connected conditions and his current heart issues.,Additional evidence, including VA and private treatment records, needs to be obtained in order to fully evaluate the Veteran's claim for hypertension. The Board finds it necessary to ensure all possible development has been accomplished before proceeding further with this matter.,The nature and progression of the Veteran's diabetes mellitus need to be clarified through additional medical examination and evaluation. This will help determine if there is a link between his service-connected conditions and his current diabetes issues.,Additional evidence, including VA and private treatment records, needs to be obtained in order to fully evaluate the Veteran's claim for stress fractures. The Board finds it necessary to ensure all possible development has been accomplished before proceeding further with this matter.

Claimed conditions
bilateral pes planus, back disorder, bilateral hearing loss, asbestosis, sleep apnea, heart disorder, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, stress fractures, syphilis
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 23, 2022
Citation
22030384

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22030384.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.