Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of second degree burns on the left hand is denied as there is no current disability related to these burns.,The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for ichthyosis vulgaris prior to August 31, 2009, from August 31, 2009 prior to November 5, 2010, and from November 5, 2010 prior to February 1, 2017 is remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records and further development.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss is remanded as there are issues regarding in-service noise exposure and a potential central processing auditory disorder (CAPD).,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart disorder of atrial fibrillation and cardiomyopathy is remanded due to the need for an addendum opinion addressing the significance of his elevated blood pressure readings, lay history of headaches and dizziness, and arrhythmias in relation to his condition.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a current disability related to the Veteran's service-connected second degree burns on the left hand.,Additional VA treatment records are needed to determine if there is a current disability of ichthyosis vulgaris and further development is required due to the need for an addendum opinion addressing in-service noise exposure, lay history, and arrhythmias.,The Veteran's service-connected traumatic brain injury may be aggravating his hearing loss and/or central processing auditory disorder (CAPD).,There are issues regarding the significance of the Veteran's elevated blood pressure readings, lay history of headaches and dizziness, and arrhythmias in relation to his heart condition.

Claimed conditions
residuals of second degree burns on the left hand, ichthyosis vulgaris, bilateral hearing loss, heart disorder of atrial fibrillation and cardiomyopathy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 1, 2022
Citation
22032078

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22032078.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.