Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, heart disability, kidney disability, peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, prostate disability, sinus disability, scotoma, and respiratory disorder are all remanded for further development.,Service connection is being remanded for the Veteran's heart disability, kidney disability, peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities, hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, prostate disability (benign prostatic hypertrophy), sinus disability (allergic rhinitis), scotoma, and respiratory disorder.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's service connection claims are remanded due to inadequate development regarding in-service herbicide agent exposure and insufficient medical opinions linking the disabilities to service or service-connected conditions.,Service connection for various disabilities is being remanded as there is insufficient evidence connecting these conditions to service, including potential secondary relationships.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, type II, heart disability (including ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, mitral regurgitation, cardiomyopathy, and hypertensive heart disease with congestive heart failure), kidney disability (chronic kidney disease), peripheral neuropathy (diabetic nephropathy) of the bilateral upper extremities, peripheral neuropathy (diabetic nephropathy) of the bilateral lower extremities, hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, prostate disability (benign prostatic hypertrophy), sinus disability (allergic rhinitis), scotoma, respiratory disorder (asthma), bilateral hearing loss disability, right ear tympanoplasty residuals
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
Burn pits / airborne hazards
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 11, 2022
Citation
22039367

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 22039367.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.